PBB Collab 2.0 Update: Most of the PBB Celebrity Collab 2.0 Housemates have been violated some of the rules

PBB Collab 2.0 Housemates after their Punishment Task. (November 4, 2025)

If you have missed the November 4, 2025’s episode of Pinoy Big Brother Celebrity Collab Edition 2.0 airing on ABS-CBN’s online and GMA’s online and on-air platforms, most of the housemates, during their stay, had been violated some of it’s rules that Big Brother had said in its rule book, which resulted to a punishment task that he gave to them as a result.

In this punishment task, the violators have instructed to carry a Big Rule Book, one violation is equivalent to one rule book. For the following portions, Big Brother then allowed housemates from the same group to transfer or to receive books and lift the burden, literally, off their teammates, then he ordered them to walk around the pool, while their arms are stretched, and finally, the violators will walk around the pool thirteen times, with one housemate of their choice ending their punishment after each lap.

Joaquin Arce and Sofia Pablo received the most number of violations of five points each. For Joaquin, he violated the Talking Without Lapel policy three times, besides the other violations like what he’ve talked about – in terms of the confession room topics and about the outside world. For Sofia, She did violated the policy against talking to the camera twice, besides from pointing to it once, as well as talking about outside world and for communicating non-verbally without lapel.

Below are the other housemates of PBB Collab 2.0 who have been violated for the past few days that resulted to their punishment task, besides the housemates with highest violation points, Joaquin and Sofia, but not including Heath Jornales, Waynona Collings, Princess Aliyah, Caprice Cayetano, Miguel Vergara, John Clifford, and Reich Alim, in which they’ve received no violations during their stay:

  • Carmelle Collado: 4 Violations (for talking about nominations, the outside world, and the audition process, and for making a communication between the camera)
  • Inigo Jose: 3 Violations (for talking about confession room topics, cursing, and non-verbal communications without lapel)
  • Krystal Mejes: 3 Violations (for pointing to the camera, and for talking about nomination and for doing so without lapel)
  • Lee Victor: 2 Violations (for talking about outside world topics and for doing so without lapel)
  • Anton Vinzon: 2 Violations (for talking about confession room topics and for whispering)
  • Fred Moser: 2 Violations (for talking about nominations and the outside world)
  • Marco Masa: 2 Violations (for communicating non-verbally without lapel and for whispering)
  • Ashley Sarmiento: 1 Violation (for cursing)
  • Eliza Borromeo: 1 Violation (for pointing to the camera)
  • Lella Ford: 1 Violation (for talking about confession room topics)
  • Rave Victoria: 1 Violation (for talking about audition process)

PHCA CID: PHCA-2025H2-6837

DRPS Philippine Commercial Archives Avatar

DRPS Philippine Commercial Archives is one of the Philippine TV and Radio Media Archive and News Entities, which not only preserves the archives of TV, Radio, and Print Advertising but also covers news involving various happenings in Philippine Television and current events.

Established on January 27, 2021, DRPS PHCA owns the flagship and most-viewed YouTube Channel of the Archive, DRPS One Channel, and its TV Ad Archive Channel. It also owns the other channels on YouTube, such as DRPS Two (Radio), DRPS Xtra (Online), and DRPS Three (Compilations of TV Ads).

DRPS PHCA also owns its very own Advertisement Counter service, DRPS PHCA TV Ad Listings, as published on X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, Instagram Threads, and on our website.

Areas of Expertise: Entertainment, Advertisements, Philippine Culture, Philippines, TV Commercials, Radio Commercials, PH TV and Radio Updates, Pinoy Big Brother (PBB) Updates, PBB Gen 11 Supporter
100% Written by DRPS PHCA

Our Fact Checking Process

All of our news posts on DRPSPHCA.com are true and accurate, and are based on factual review of the related content of this blog post.
Reviewed by: Subject Matter Experts

Our Review Board

Our content is carefully reviewed by experienced professionals to ensure accuracy and relevance.
  • Qualified Experts: Each article is assessed by specialists with field-specific knowledge.
  • Up-to-date Insights: We incorporate the latest research, trends, and standards.
  • Commitment to Quality: Reviewers ensure clarity, correctness, and completeness.
Look for the expert-reviewed label to read content you can trust.
Scroll to Top